Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eddie willers
You sound just like a defense attorney trying to say anything to get his client off.

"They didn't find a body....they found a skull."

The body was skeletonized. We all know that. Don't parse words.

"A skull that had been tampered with by the meter reader."

Even if true, and it's only speculation, what is that supposed to change? That makes it an accidental death? Be serious.

"The only thing that could be said _with certainty_ was that duct tape was found with the remains."

"As to where the tape was placed on the body was pure supposition.

Certainty isn't required. Beyond a reasonable doubt, remember? And no, the tape was wrapped around the head. There was testimony about the fact the tape was what kept the jawbone and the skull together.

"Yeah....it's a shame that the evidence was lost in that fetid swamp....but lost it was."

Sure, some potential evidence was lost. But there was still enough evidence to prove a murder, and that Casey did it.

322 posted on 07/07/2011 9:30:08 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]


To: mlo
Even if true, and it's only speculation, what is that supposed to change?

The prosecution went to great pains to demonstrate that the duct tape, if properly placed, was just wide enough to cover both mouth and nose.

Covering mouth and nose is murder....covering the mouth but leaving the nose exposed is an attempt at silencing. So that the skull was tampered with and the position of the tape now indeterminable means a great deal indeed.

324 posted on 07/07/2011 10:09:52 AM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson