You got that right. If that baby were in their family tree, or in their neighborhood, they wouldn't have spent only 10 hours, 45 minutes, and 33 seconds on a case like this. These wimps didn't have the intellectual stamina nor the internal value of human life that required their due diligence.
Yes, thank you. I am watching the alternate "juror" Russell Huegler being interviewed right now. As I suspected, a complete imbecile . I took notes so here are some of his comments:
"According to Judge Perry's instructions, if you have the slightest reservation you have to vote not guilty."
"We thought there was a horrific accident."
"Here were the three main problems:
1. "Prosecution did not show any motive. Why would a good mother who loved her daughter suddenly kill her?"
2. "Didn't buy" that Casey was a party girl..."she had a good support system."
3. "Prosecution couldn't show how Caylee died."
Mark Fuhrman just came on after him and ripped him a new one.
What is worse, the guy is a high school GOVERNMENT teacher. Talk about the blind leading the blind. So wonder kids are turning out stupid.
The jury - especially this woman - lacked common sense and critical thinking skills. A poor baby, moldering in a swamp, wrapped in duct tape and plastic, put no foul play occurred.
Meanwhile, she thinks George and Casey “were up to something.” No evidence there, though, just the usual “blame Daddy who is probably a kiddie rapist.”