Are you playing the man vs. woman card?
The evidence was not overwhelming, you don’t know the whole story, you were not in the court room, you got all of your info from the media...just let it go.
The jury has ruled. Hopefully you get an open-minded jury when you are charged with a crime.
IN SPADES, CHAMP.
The evidence was not overwhelming, you don’t know the whole story, you were not in the court room, you got all of your info from the media...just let it go.
Unless you were a juror, you're limited by the same restrictions you just stated. So why are you so sure of yourself? Or are you suggesting that no one should have any opinion, and we should just presume that we simply cannot think at all, and must be told by our betters what things mean? (except you, of course)
The jury has ruled. Hopefully you get an open-minded jury when you are charged with a crime.
The jury is WRONG. Obviously wrong. Openly wrong. Demonstrably wrong. There's been a GROSS miscarriage of justice, and it's plain to tens of millions of people, not just me.
Hopefully if you're ever arrested, you'll be able to lick the necessary jackboots shiny enough to keep from being charged with a crime.
Your demand for cringing obedience and self-abnegation is hereby REJECTED.
You mean “hopefully” Talisker doesn’t have their two-year old simply come up missing and Talisker doesn’t report it for 30+ days and then Talisker lies constantly to the police about the disappearance of the two-year old?
Is that the kind of “hopefully” you are talking about?
I guess, you believe the idiots that stated she was a “good mother” too?!?! Let me give you an applicable quote, “Stupid is as stupid does!”