So...beyond reasonable doubt. It seems to have meant to this jury is that rational thought, reason and making reasonable connections with the circumstantial evidence, and disposing of logic to rush to a conclusion which served their own desires of emancipation and on to fame.
You know, not only that but if this jury really still believed her to be guilty after the trial but felt the state had some questions to answer - why not hang the jury so the state can get their case tightened up for another trial?
Instead, they not only allow a person they know killed a 2 year old walk free, they assure she can’t be retried for the murder because they were stupid/tired/ignorant and could not come up with a verdict. Not to mention some comments we are hearing out of the jury that is beginning to make us wonder if there was jury misconduct during this trial.
I hope Judge Perry and the State are taking a good look at what took place during deliberations and in fact, throughout the entire trial.