That explains it, doesn't it.
Was she paid to talk?????
This is such crap. The evidence for manslaughter, at least, was overwhelming. And for murder it was a slam-dunk for anyone who added up all of the coincidental evidence. And yes, if there is enough coincidental evidence, and it forms a tight enough pattern, it is enough to convict for murder one.
If Casey was a man, she would have been convicted of first degree murder, and no one would even remotely question it.
Dennis Miller said it best tonight when he said Anthony was entitled to a jury of 12 of her peers. She’s a moron and they managed to find 12 other morons. LOL!
WHAT THE HELL? She is "sick to our stomachs", what the hell?
When you checked that NOT GUILTY box, you knew what you were doing. Are you as STUPID AS YOU SOUND with that statement.
Did you think that was a trick question? Simple question, Guilty, Not Guilty, just which one did YOU check madamn?
You make me sick to my stomach, you idiot.
>> Casey Anthony juror Jennifer Ford said today that she and the other jurors cried and were “sick to our stomachs” after voting to acquit Casey Anthony
Then *why* did you vote that way? Good grief.
“Huekler said he believed Caylee’s death was just a horrific accident and that Casey Anthony was a good mother.”
You can’t fix stupid.
Right there is a good reason to bring the jury back and start questioning them about their behavior ~ and sending the guilty ones to jail to depurge themselves!
Oh cry me a river you ignorant woman! I hope you never forget what you and those 11 other morons have done.
Right there is a good reason to bring the jury back and start questioning them about their behavior ~ and sending the guilty ones to jail to depurge themselves!
That explains it, doesn't it.
The prosecutors blew it, they were never able to determine cause of death...see
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/on-the-record/transcript/casey-anthony-case-csi-look-forensic-evidence
And then the body was cremated, to where no further forensics could be performed..the whole thing stinks...
There you go. Some people persist in thinking that the problem here wasn't the jury. It's just that the prosecution didn't do a good job. Nope. They were idiots.
They weren't being asked to determine the punishment. That would only have happened if they had voted guilty on the 1st degree murder charge, and that would have been a separate proceeding.
Can't prove what the crime was? Let's see. The child's body is found in bag, dumped in a field, with duct tape wrapped around the head. Call me naive, but I think the crime we're looking at here is pretty obvious. But I guess I don't have an idiot's perspective.
Could have gone with a hung jury then. At least the case could have been re-tried later on...Whatever...nation of idiots, arrogant shmucks abound and everything is upside down in this topsy turvy society.
I have no empathy for these jurors. Juror number 3 and the rest of them, should have at least considered the evidence.
About 10 hours, including meals and they walk out with nothing... but feeling sick.
They SHOULD feel sick and I suspect some of them will feel sick for the rest of their lives.
Has there ever been an instance of a child drowning in a pool and someone trying to cover up the drowning of the child? EVER?
These oafs have the distinction of being the stupidest jury in the history of the world. At least the O.J. morons can hide behind jury nullification.
just think of it as a really late-term abortion.
She's in cover mode bigtime.