Posted on 07/06/2011 6:31:34 PM PDT by Hojczyk
Hi GG! i was wondering what you thought of this case, actually, since i know you live down there. Good to see you!
Critical thinking is lacking in this country.
BUT the biggest problem with this case is indeed the jurors........one had a husband who died in jail. and SHE can be trusted as a juror? did you see the list of jurors and the things that came up with them. how about a high school diploma being needed.....how can you assess evidence if you never even graduated from high school?
Interesting, but entirely reflective of the Warren Court (”we’ll just correct this outdated document with a few tune-ups here and there”).
But with or without Griffin, the whole idea of the oath on which the fairness of the Fifth depends is significantly different today from what the Founders or even Warren intended: Is there any doubt that both Anthony parents will be spared perjury-charges? That omission further erodes the value of the oath. Further, what’s the value (even if it can be forced) of a liar’s “testimony”? There’s no question at all that Griffin erodes the intent of the Fifth, but mightn’t the lost integrity of the oath cause even more harm?
Hannity seems very proud of himself for agreeing with the jury.
Didn’t she and some of her family get a trip to Disney World compliments of ABC?
Turns out the jury did have access to and were watching tv, which was removed at some point. I will try to locate where I found that information if I can .
Gilfoyle was downright heroic!
I saw that.I have it on live.
The local Pensacola ABC affiliate, WEAR-TV 3, sent a reporter downtown to ask people on the street their reaction to the verdict.
Mostly shock and anger, but one young man about college age asked, “If you don’t have enough evidence, why in hell did you go to trial?”..............
For his punishment he should date Casey.
Scott Peterson is in prison. His wife and unborn son were found decomposing in water.
He cleaned up the scene of death so good that there was absolutely no evidence of murder.
Yet, an intelligent jury was able to piece together the circumstantial evidence beyond a reasonable doubt and find him guilty of the crime he committed.
I haven’t paid much attention to their backgrounds - but yeah, clearly there is a problem with basic common sense and ability to sift through what is credible and what is not.
“During trial, jurors lived solitary life”
“Their calls were monitored, as were family visits. Texts, e-mail, the Internet, all forbidden. AFTER A WHILE THEY EVEN LOST THEIR TV PRIVILEGES.”
http://www.theledger.com/article/20110706/NEWS/110709683
What happened that “after a while they even lost their tv privileges”?
Apparently there were newsfeeds that the jurors had access to.
But, the prosecutor, as well as the defense, had plenty of opportunity to voir dire each and every member of this jury and take unwanted jurors off the panel. Both the prosecutor and the defense formally accepted this jury.
Very good question - like you, I thought these jurors weren’t aware of the case, yet they knew there was a huge amount of sensationalism?
True, this jury was a bunch of low IQ fools. Let by a foreman that is probably an anti death penalty liberal. He was some sort of half ass coach.
Didn’t the prosecutor have peremptory challenges left? I believe he did.
After the 31 days that sealed it, the gravy of evidence went to court. The prosecution presented the goods. They had who, what, how, and why, plus a car and a swamp, motive, and opportunity, tethered to Casey-31 Days-Anthony.
The defense had Casey. They were left with nothing but fruit salad right to argue, right out of Casey’s play book. You know, where it was 1. everyone’s fault but hers, 2. “look over here, no, look over there, no, look back over here”, and 3. “I’m a nut and tend to lie”. This is Scott Peterson in a skirt.
Exactly...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.