[Jim Scott]

You are simply wrong on the facts. The evidence was quite clear that the child was missing for more than a month. In fact the defense admitted that in court. The jurors simply ignored the law, the evidence and common sense where the aggravated abuse statute is concerned. They nullified the aggravated abuse statute just like the OJ jury nullified the murder statute. And the amount of people who are sanguine about that is right out of Kafka.

I am not 'wrong on the facts'. My point was that the jurors did not believe that Casey knew for a fact that Caylee was 'missing'. I won't dispute that they decided to believe what they apparently wanted to believe in this case and I have stated, quite clearly, that I disagree with their verdict.

You should be advised that self-righteousness, even in a just cause, is not compelling. Our collective disapproval and disgust won't change the verdict - and your outrage has been duly noted. I suggest that you give it a rest.

[jwalsh07]

I suggest that you give it a rest.

Or what? You'll tell me again that you weren't wrong on the facts when you were?

My point was that the jurors did not believe that Casey knew for a fact that Caylee was 'missing'.

Surely you jest. The defense claimed in court that Caylee drowned on June 16, 2008. On July 16, 2008 Cindy Anthony reported her missing granddaughter to the police after her daughter Casey admitted she hadn't seen her daughter in weeks.

You sure we're talking about the same case?