[truthfreedom]

I’m not defending the poll.

But when you’re going 1st - it was an online poll, or 2nd, they have some magical way to only call Ron Paul supporters, you’re missing the most obvious choice.

The most obvious choice is that there was no poll at all.

It’s just typing on a website.

And how do we know that any pollsters aren’t just making stuff up?

I saw this poll and saw that it had Ron Paul at 22% and I said, hey, why not post this. It does have the appearance of a new poll.

But if you look at my enthusiasm, right now, I probably spend as much time putting facts on the endless stream of Rick Perry threads than I’m doing hyping Ron Paul.

I also spend a lot of time defending Palin and agreeing with people who write about how when she announces, there will be so much money coming in that everyone will be stunned.

And I’m also warning people about Marcus Bachmann.

[Allegra]

The most obvious choice is that there was no poll at all.

It’s just typing on a website.

Then why post it on here?

I saw this poll and saw that it had Ron Paul at 22% and I said, hey, why not post this. It does have the appearance of a new poll.

OK, but what if it was some other unknown, unverified poll but reflected say, Rick Perry leading with 22% instead? Would you have posted it?

Didn't think so. ;-)