partiotsoul....I think your post pointing to 3cc’s of missing blood sample is a perfect illustration of my point regarding the definition of resonable doubt.
The fact is that it WAS O.J.’s blood, and Nicole’s blood...the claim that there was 3cc’s missing doesn’t change the fact that the DNA evidence proved that it was their blood....three missing cc’s in no way constitutes “reasonable doubt”.
three missing cc’s in no way constitutes “reasonable doubt”.
maybe not. But knowing that the investigators did not COLLECT the OJ DNA blood until a week after they “collected” lots of other evidence brings doubt within reason (to me).