[CA Conservative]

It would been an entree to a court fight delaying or killing the legislation with the politician using their signature on the unfulfilled legislation as fuel for an election. Moderate Brewer played that card right to win re-election in Arizona and Perry would have used it for a potential presidential bid or other future political campaigns.

Talk about trying to have your cake and eat it too! On the one hand, you suggest that Perry didn't want the legislation to pass, and the legislature just accomodated him by killing it. On the other hand, you suggest that Perry wanted it to pass so he could sign it, secure in the knowledge that it would be overturned by the courts.

Both suggestions are based on your personal opinion, but not founded on any verifiable facts. Yet you throw these ideas out as if they were unassailable.

I get it, you don't like Perry. You like Palin. But don't try to pass off your bias against Perry as objective criticism based on fact.

[Nextrush]

I’m trying to figure out what the truth is here.

Perry is talking the talk right now but I’ve seen that a hundred times before going back to the 1970’s when I was young.

I’ve learned over the years that there is a political process going on that ignores the convictions of the average citizen in favor of compromise or outright deception. There is a lot of hustling coming from the politicians.

I can see the potential scenarios that may have played out, but I don’t claim to have proof of that.

I don’t want a fight with anyone or even to create one.

I want to get information out there to give us all a chance to think about these candidates more.

I’ve already identified flaws in Sarah Palin, but its true, we all have them including Perry and the others in this race.

I have my first preference, that’s obvious.

But I’m not here to hurt.