It was such a disgustingly horrid thing that I chose not to follow it much.
What I did read . . . sounds like the woman skated free of a dispicable crime on schlocky work on the prosecution's side and slick work on the defense side plus perhaps a jury that didn't realize the jury has the authority in our system to also judge the law and render whatever parts of the law null and void in a particular case should it so see fit.
Seems to me a smart foreman should have taken charge of this jury and insisted that the jurors judge the law and the evidence as they saw fit--demanding to see whatever additional evidence they saw fit. Maybe that wouldn't have flown but as I understand it--it could have.
At least that's my layman's understanding of such things. I'm sure the atny's hereon will set me right if I'm wrong.
I think the courts are inching towards making it OK as one commie globalist championed--being able to kill one's child at will up to the age of 7 years old--with impunity.
Too often, it seems to me, it is the case that juries--given various outs of the more industrious to escape serving on juries--include too many clueless idiots who couldn't reason their way out of a wet paper bag nor fairly analyze evidence sufficiently to safely buy fruit at a farmer's market.
Part of me wonders if they commie globalist oligarchy isn't setting up court cases to make an increasing mockery of Christian values and to throw as many monkey wrenches into the legal system to make a mockery of it as possible.
There's been an assertion in the commie globalist literature that the future will include the mandate from the elite globalist rulers to the police for the police to shoot dead on sight anyone caught breaking any law.
So evidently they are planning to toss juries entirely. Seems to me that juries making absurd rulings hastens that day.
Just my RK (Resident Kook) opinion, of course.
Those paying any attention to it should be warned that Big Brother is watching.
