To: library user
Except I don’t believe the jury went on reasonable doubt. They were troubled because there wasn’t VIDEO or something to show Casey willfully murdered her child. The goofy alternate said that he suspected George had something to do with the murder.
The Judge should have refused to let the Defense go with the stupid pool defense. But I suspect he thought the jurors were smarter than they turned out to be.
To: miss marmelstein
But I suspect he thought the jurors were smarter than they turned out to be. The jury fell for Baez's "George bad guy, dysfunctional family" gambit. Do you find it as ironic as I do that he begged the jury to avoid an emotional verdict, and in the end they did anyway and that is what spared his client?
2,469 posted on
07/06/2011 7:08:53 AM PDT by
truthkeeper
(Vote Against Barack Obama in 2012!)
To: miss marmelstein
Except I dont believe the jury went on reasonable doubt.
Of course they didn't. This jury used any doubt whatsoever. By that standard, no one could get convicted, even if their were finger prints on the duct tape, or high definition video of the crime. One of the idiot jurors would have said "I don't trust the finger prints, I saw once on TV that they can be put there by the police to frame someone." and "That video is suspicious, I saw how the government made those fake moon landings video."
2,471 posted on
07/06/2011 7:12:12 AM PDT by
ZX12R
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson