I don’t believe I impliied that. I was responding to someone who was surprised that this was some kind of special tape of limited manufacture. The original poster seemed to doubt this, or that the prosecution had not revealed this. I was merely pointing out that George testified to his probable ownership of the tape on the witness stand, although he was cagy about it. I never said that it wasn’t available to anybody who lived in that household.
Sorry to get it wrong! I have had trouble reading the last hundred posts and should not have barged in without knowing the whole conversation.