screaminsunshine, your glee on this thread has been just a "bit" unbecoming. Even you did not think Casey Anthony would get out of this when the verdict was about to be read. May I remind you of your post? Yes, I think I will.
post 427
Do not worry there will be another trial in a couple years.
Now, I have listened to you in the past week in a half, searched through the evidence for myself. I was pretty convinced, for myself, that there was enough evidence to convict her, even of death.
What little I've read from the alternate juror, is that he focussed on the dysfunctional family, was not convinced they had told the whole truth (duh), wasn't even convinced there was any decomposition in the car that Casey drove.
Wasn't it you who kept saying believe the dogs....they don't lie. They hit on decomp in the car and the backyard.....you kept repeating over and over, the dogs are believable. I agreed totally after reading their resumes and reading the testimony surrounding their finds. It kept me digging as to why they may have hit in the backyard because it wasn't adding up for me. If you hadn't noticed....I'm not a "mob-rule" (as so many on this thread are easily throwing around) kind of gal, or want to be popular. I search for evidence, theories that make sense, you get the drill.
Well, obviously the jurors (at least the alternate) didn't give a rip about the dogs, but focussed more on the family/ their testimony/ the defense's confusing molestation/not molestation/throw everything at the wall diatribe.
Now, I don't want to ever see an innocent person convicted. Neither do I want to see a jury make a decision on "feelings" or "confusion". I want them to make a decision on facts. IMO, they did not.
BTW, your prediction may be right. There may be another trial in a couple of years for Casey. Maybe it will be 10-20 years. Who knows. She will be back in court eventually for something. I hope there are no more dead victims associated with her.