It is amazing how many know it alls on this thread never watched the trial and never paid an ounce of attention. Yet today, they know the case wasn’t proved and think Casey should walk.
Very telling.
But not a one of them can explain how that child in the custody of her mother ended up in a swamp, dead with duct tape wrapped around her head, and why Mom dumped her car smelling like death near a check cashing place and went on to party for 31 days.
I agree with you, although I didn’t watch much of the trial.
Common sense went AWOL with that jury - as the prosecution feared.
Child Protective Services take children away from parents for lesser crimes. Certainly, she should have been charged with not reporting a death and abuse of a corpse.
I believe the State should have charged her with everything from A thru Z...just in case. But that’s 20/20 hindsight.
I give up;(
You’re right. One of the posters sent me a link to a NYT article that stated the dead-opposite of the actual evidence as proof that there was nothing at all found in the car. Yet this poster thinks that they’ve got it all figured out.
I am a serious late-comer to this story. But I did my homework before I made a decision.
Are there any FReepers who’ve *actually* delved deep into this who really believe that there’s reasonable doubt?