To: youngidiot
She wasn't even guilty of child abuse? REALLY? It's absurd. Unfortunately, she wasn't charged with that crime.
What evidence do you have to support she abused the child?
Not what you think, present evidence.
Maybe the prosecution should have charged her with what they could prove instead of going for charges they had no evidence to support???
Just a thought.
1,179 posted on
07/05/2011 12:45:16 PM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
(Woah, Obama will appease Trump, but not Lakin? Thanks LSM)
To: Las Vegas Ron
I'm pretty sure bizarre and extreme indifference to the whereabouts, much less well being, of one's child would count as child abuse.
Deliberately misleading law enforcement efforts to locate and establish the well being of one's child?
To: Las Vegas Ron
Unfortunately, she wasn't charged with that crime. What evidence do you have to support she abused the child? Not what you think, present evidence. Maybe the prosecution should have charged her with what they could prove instead of going for charges they had no evidence to support??? Just a thought.
She was charged with it. Count 2, aggravated child abuse. NOT GUILTY. Even if you buy the Defense's cockamamie story, she was present when the child died.
To: Las Vegas Ron
Unfortunately, she wasn't charged with that crime. Yes, she was. Aggravated child abouse was the 2nd charge.
To: Las Vegas Ron
She was charged with it.
Read up, Ron.
1,574 posted on
07/05/2011 2:54:02 PM PDT by
Carling
(At some point, those surrounding Obama have to realize that they are working for a psychopath)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson