Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keystone: Pipeline Battle Pits Economy vs. Environment, Again
FoxNews ^ | July 04, 2011 | James Rosen

Posted on 07/04/2011 6:10:34 PM PDT by Ron C.

Keystone-XL will rank alongside the pyramids in Giza as one of the most ambitious construction projects ever undertaken – if the $7 billion pipeline ever gets built.

The proposed route runs south over 330 miles of southern Canadian soil, clipping the corner of Saskatchewan to reach the border with America, then snakes gently southeast across seven U.S. states, extending another 1,370 miles until it branches off to hit two destinations in the Gulf of Mexico.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Front Page News; Mexico
KEYWORDS: canada; energy; envirofascism; environment; keystone; mexico; oil; pipeline; saskatchewan
Again 'environmentalists' oppose oil delivery, this time against one of the most ambitious efforts that will enrich not only our nation, but Canada as well.
1 posted on 07/04/2011 6:10:39 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

It’s already operating in Canada. Their hoping to be linked into the pipeline in the Williston Basin in North Dakota.


2 posted on 07/04/2011 6:16:11 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (You have entered an invalid birthday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Well - hate to post and run - but it’s back to the salt-mine at work. Had a moment while waiting for others to clear telcom problems, now it’s time to finish up and go home.


3 posted on 07/04/2011 6:16:50 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
Canada will not suffer if this pipeline project is turned down. The oil will find its way to market. Another pipeline will be built over the mountains to the Canadian west coast. Anyone care to guess where it will go from there? I'll give you a hint, a large, expanding asian power will buy all the oil that can be loaded on to tankers.

Americans should ask themselves who would be the loser in that case? This should be a no brainer.

4 posted on 07/04/2011 6:38:42 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (We .. have a purpose .. no longer to please every dictator with a vote at the UN. PM Harper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
Keystone: Pipeline Battle Pits Economy vs. Crooks Posing as "Environmentalists" Again

There, fixed it.

This has NOTHING to do with the environment. It has everything to do with a claque of crooked lawyers POSING as "environmentalists" funded by the tax-exempt "charitable" foundations belonging to big investors in existing energy sources. A fraction of the money this project generates could be used to fund actual habitat improvements, which, for the most part, are badly needed in this country.

Why? Because these thieves are wrecking wild-land habitat with their crooked racketeering politics justified with bogus beliefs. I want these thugs hung from the charred remains of the trees they "protected."

5 posted on 07/04/2011 6:44:19 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Gasoline prices in Chicago jumped in late May when an Enbridge pipeline was shut down to repair a couple leaks. Repairing the pipeline took a few days. For gas prices to come back down took weeks.

No sooner had gas prices dropped to $3.79 a gallon than they shot up again when a BP pipeline sprung a leak in Montana. The experiences of May and July show that without the proposed pipeline from Canada, gasoline prices will be at least 20 cents higher.


6 posted on 07/04/2011 6:46:21 PM PDT by Qout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

So true!


7 posted on 07/04/2011 6:46:33 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
It has everything to do with a claque of crooked lawyers POSING as "environmentalists" funded by the tax-exempt "charitable" foundations belonging to big investors in existing energy sources.

I would posit that most of the "charitable" money contributed to the environmental cause doesn't come from so-called "competitors", but from the "professional left" idle rich: The Gettys, the Rockefellers, the Sulzbergers, the Pritzkers, etc.

I.e., people with lots of money, who never earned a dime. The left's "useful idiots"...

8 posted on 07/04/2011 6:55:52 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: okie01
...people with lots of money, who never earned a dime. The left's "useful idiots"...

Yep. Plenty of those. And the national debt sure is thirsty lately. Hmmmmmm....

9 posted on 07/04/2011 7:16:23 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All


Help With The Conservative Battle
On The Road To 2012
For One Time (Or Better Yet)
Monthly Donations To FR
Click Here!!

10 posted on 07/04/2011 7:22:11 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Qout
I don't know if Hussein wants this project or not. I really don't think he does. Keep supply down and you increase the cost. Isn't that what he is all about?

Also, keep out the dirty tar sands oil and save the environment. Another one of his constituencies is addressed.

Like I said, this should be a no brainer, but with no brains in Washington, you never know.

11 posted on 07/04/2011 8:09:34 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (We .. have a purpose .. no longer to please every dictator with a vote at the UN. PM Harper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: okie01
I would posit that most of the "charitable" money contributed to the environmental cause doesn't come from so-called "competitors", but from the "professional left" idle rich: The Gettys, the Rockefellers, the Sulzbergers, the Pritzkers, etc.

Did you read your own list? Gosh, what is the principal investment of the Gettys and Rockefellers???? Did you go to the link?

The biggest donors to the Natural Resources Defense Council are the Pews (SUNOCO), the W. Alton Jones Foundation (Citgo), and the Rockefeller brothers (Exxon Mobil). The Rockefeller clan started the Environmental Grantmakers' Association and were big in starting the IUCN. The British Royals (BP) and Prince Bernhard (SHELL) were principal actors in starting the WWF and the WWFN. Even the Packard Foundation has nearly a billion tied up in methane hydride investments.

The left's "useful idiots"...

NO, the left are THEIR useful idiots. It is the Democrats who are the party of the extremely wealthy. The reason is simple, socialism is one-stop shopping for controlling markets.

12 posted on 07/04/2011 8:18:07 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Did you read your own list? Gosh, what is the principal investment of the Gettys and Rockefellers????

You give these people more credit than I do. I don't think the source of their money has anything to do with the way they decide to piss it away. By and large, we're talking a dumb, pliable "do good" mentality.

The salons of the 21st century are little different from the ones of a century ago, when Kropotkin mulcted millions from the Astors, the Morgans, etc. for the benefit of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin.

13 posted on 07/04/2011 8:30:14 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: okie01
You give these people more credit than I do.

Sigh, they do know how to hire good lawyers.

The salons of the 21st century are little different from the ones of a century ago, when Kropotkin mulcted millions from the Astors, the Morgans, etc. for the benefit of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin.

May I suggest a little background research into the banking families of Europe.

14 posted on 07/04/2011 10:05:23 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: okie01

The Getty gene pool has certainly contributed to the number of morons found in this world.


15 posted on 07/05/2011 8:15:15 AM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Qout

It’s been demonstrated time and time and time and time again that gas prices go up faster than they come down.


16 posted on 07/05/2011 3:28:37 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (You have entered an invalid birthday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Qout

By the way, that was not a BP pipeline that sprung a leak in Montana, that was an ExxonMobil pipeline.


17 posted on 07/05/2011 3:30:04 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (You have entered an invalid birthday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson