WKA....seriously? This case has nothing to do with the definition of natural born Citizen.
“WKA....seriously? This case has nothing to do with the definition of natural born Citizen.”
The Court of Appeals of Indiana cited WKA on natural-born citizenship, in a unanimous opinion affirming the dismissal of Ankeny v. Daniels (quoted in post 82 of this thread). The current edition of Black’s Law Dictionary cites WKA on the definition of the term*. Articles on presidential eligibility in the peer-reviewed literature of American law cite WKA, including Charles Gordon’s 1968 paper which the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California cited in the eligibility suit Barnett v. Obama.
So, bluecat6, do you have citations to back up your claim there, or is it just what you came up with playing make-believe constitutional scholar?
(*)I looked it up in Black’s a year or so ago. I don’t actually own a copy. I’ll re-check, and correct myself if wrong.