Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: noinfringers3

He was really referring to The New World Order. He used the term on numerous occasions.


19 posted on 07/03/2011 4:01:13 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: unkus

Blaming Bush? Obama, Hillary, Dems are hiding away billions from stimulus, unions, Acorn, etc... They don’t care. When the run is over they all have fortunes. Hillary knew all about Obama’s ineligibility. Pelosi was the final link. Or bush could have committed a crime and then gave you more to bitch about.
Clintons(both), Edwards, Kerry, Reid, Pelosi were all building their fortunes and using the people to accomplish their goals. would it have mattered if Bush did anything? Not in the least. They hid Able Danger and 911. sandy Berger stole documents right out of the archives. did the Dems police their own. Of course not.


30 posted on 07/04/2011 6:04:48 AM PDT by DrDude (Focused like a LASER on creating jobs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: unkus

My question is. What is this ‘New World Order’ thing that Bush1 was talking about? Was it a prelude to or
another term for Obama’s ‘Change’?


32 posted on 07/04/2011 7:23:51 AM PDT by noinfringers3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson