Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Former Fetus

yeah and the freakin retards say marijuana is harmless.

Even if you could prove some medical benefit to marijuana, smoking it wouldn’t be the delivery method.

Stupid hippies just want to get high


2 posted on 07/02/2011 7:45:08 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yldstrk
yeah and the freakin retards say marijuana is harmless.

Nothing is 'harmless'. Not water, not food, not anything. This person should be tossed into prison for the rest of his natural life regardless of the substances he was impaired by at the time of this incident.

L

4 posted on 07/02/2011 7:48:34 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

*But* cigarettes *must* be banned.

That deadly second/third/fourth hand smoke kills people, you know.

Hypocrites.

[am I the only person who’s noticed that pot has *smoke* too?]


12 posted on 07/02/2011 7:59:19 PM PDT by Salamander (I wear my sunglasses at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

Alcohol is much worse than marijuana. Just ask a cop.


29 posted on 07/02/2011 8:56:38 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

A driver can be “impaired” by pot, alcohol, cocaine, heroin, lack of sleep, methadone, foot cramps, and about 40 other things, half of which are legal. To use this accident to try to make a point about pot is foolish.


32 posted on 07/02/2011 9:30:17 PM PDT by tickmeister (tickmeister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk
yeah and the freakin retards say marijuana is harmless. Even if you could prove some medical benefit to marijuana, smoking it wouldn’t be the delivery method. Stupid hippies just want to get high

Careful - pot is much like booze in its effects. It's not the substance so much as the person who uses the substance that causes problems. Your argument about it not being harmless because some of the people who use it cause harm is the same argument that those who would take our guns away use - we say guns are harmless and it's the person who uses it and they point out that because they can be used for harm makes it wise to confiscate them...

I used to agree with you, but immersion in political "discussions" over the years has taught me the importance of consistency in defining what one stands for. If I agree with one set of actions, the n I have to agree with those that use the exact same principle, even if it entails something that I don't like. Else, I become a cherry-picking enigma that is all over the spectrum and holding to no definable set of principles.

43 posted on 07/03/2011 3:53:38 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

Their argument is that it makes you driver BETTER because it relaxes you. Didn’t work out for this guy (or the people that he killed).


60 posted on 08/07/2011 11:54:01 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson