Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

One difference is that Strauss-Khan’s DNA was found on the maid. In Duke case, the DNA on the stripper was from NONE of the Duke players, one of whom was not even there, IIRC. The source of the DNA was not made public.


62 posted on 07/02/2011 4:00:47 PM PDT by Jane Austen (Boycott the Philadelphia Eagles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Jane Austen

The source of the DNA was not made public, most likely because the people (I believe there were three possible DNA matches, none of which matched any lacrosse player) were not on file. DNA can only be matched to someone - it cannot, of itself, identify them.


63 posted on 07/02/2011 4:49:36 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson