Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: org.whodat
I think you have it backwards...she must prove that he did.
53 posted on 07/02/2011 1:41:13 PM PDT by starlifter (Pullum sapit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: starlifter

No the evidence already says he did it. He has no defense, that is why he is attempting to try the case in public where some people think allegations are fact, even if said allegations would never be allowed in a court room.


55 posted on 07/02/2011 2:03:14 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: starlifter
I think you have it backwards...she must prove that he did.

Very, very wrong. She don't have to prove anything. All she has to do is make the accusation. Then, the pros come in to do the proving. Those pros have a lot of formal training and experience in doing the proving and no conscience or sympathy for the accused.

If you don't know how the law works in a rape case, your a$$ is just hanging out there to take a beating.

57 posted on 07/02/2011 2:25:17 PM PDT by CharlyFord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson