To: org.whodat
I have yet to read any proof he did not do what she said.
This is why the U.S. legal system requires that the prosecution must, beyond a reasonable doubt, prove that the defendant DID commit a crime. There is no requirement for the Defense to prove that the defendant DID NOT commit a crime, which would be a ridiculous requirement, at least in a non-totalitarian state.
To: Signalman
Yes, the man is as guilty as hell from the facts given to date.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson