Posted on 07/02/2011 8:55:19 AM PDT by massmike
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)
______________________________________________________________
I thought for sure it was gonna be Lindsey Graham.
>>DOMA, folks, is on the wrong side of history.
Go ahead liberals. Keep destroying civilization. Eventually, we’ll be too weak to fight back and then the muslims will come in to “save” us.
Then, let’s see where the LGBT agenda winds up? (Answer: swinging from a lamp post)
Please tell me this is a play on words on this issue:
video project was spearheaded by Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), who won Joe Bidens seat
The unadulterated ignorance and arrogance of that statement is flabbergasting!
Any response by real American social conservertives will be met by cliches and falsehoods such as 'just worry about the economy', ...'conservatives need to stop bringing up distractions like this' and 'its the conservatives who on the wrong side of truth and American history.
Who cares if all of American legal and social history agrees with the social conservatives on this and almost every other issue.
Homosexual marriage is an oxymoron. It seeks to appropriate a sacred institution--the function of which has always been to sanctify the procreational mating process, and to provide an ongoing, multi-generational family structure--in an effort to rationalize & make respectable, what are tantamount to muscular exercises that fake sensations of normal sexuality. To the extent that their cause goes anywhere, it will eliminate the practitioners from history.
Of course, they are simply throwing around words--the verbiage of agitation, as opposed to actual reason.
For a broader perspective on the airborne nature of Leftwing "Philosophy" (rationalized wish lists): Cloud Dancing.
America needs someone with the intellectual integrity of the small boy in Hans Christian Andersen's classic fable of the Emperor's New Clothes, before we go the way of other corrupted, and now dead, civilizations. (Maybe, if we are very lucky, even a Presidential candidate, who will know how to address the fantasy world of the 21st Century era of Obama.)
William Flax
Homosexual marriage is an oxymoron. It seeks to appropriate a sacred institution--the function of which has always been to sanctify the procreational mating process, and to provide an ongoing, multi-generational family structure--in an effort to rationalize & make respectable, what are tantamount to muscular exercises that fake sensations of normal sexuality. To the extent that their cause goes anywhere, it will eliminate the practitioners from history.
Of course, they are simply throwing around words--the verbiage of agitation, as opposed to actual reason.
For a broader perspective on the airborne nature of Leftwing "Philosophy" (rationalized wish lists): Cloud Dancing.
America needs someone with the intellectual integrity of the small boy in Hans Christian Andersen's classic fable of the Emperor's New Clothes, before we go the way of other corrupted, and now dead, civilizations. (Maybe, if we are very lucky, even a Presidential candidate, who will know how to address the fantasy world of the 21st Century era of Obama.)
William Flax
They took their “theme” from a Monty Python bit.
Amazing the havoc 2% can raise when standing in front of a media spotlight that casts a false 15-25% shadow.
Even the "merely stupid" would not believe that assertion. These folks belong in the "hopelessly brainwashed" category. I am laughing with contempt at these miserable, disgusting, obnoxious people.
Christine O’Donnell was worse than this??? “project was spearheaded by Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), who won Joe Bidens seat” Bad decision, Delaware. Learn from it for next time please.
Regarding the Defense of Marriage Act:
If the Defense of Marriage Act is bigoted, hateful and the all the rest, then why did it pass in Congress overwhelmingly?
And why did some good liberals such as Chuck Schumer, Tom Harkin, and Joe Lieberman vote for it?
And that law was signed by a good Democrat, Bill Clinton.
Why are the liberals getting a pass for their support in passing the Defense of Marriage Act, if that act is on the wrong side of history and bigoted and all that????????
And if it’s so obvious how bad this law is, why didn’t good Democrats repeal it when they had the votes to do so, in the first two years of the Obama administration? I mean, if it’s so obvious what a terrible law this is, why didn’t these Democrats act on what they are saying???????
It was a liberal ploy, designed to provide breathing time for the left, much like “:Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
The “Bearded Marxist” takes it on the road.
It sure gets better, death at an early age! wow, our soceity is sick..
They should be called the Weiner Party!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.