"Naysaying criticism" -- not exactly conducive to further discussion...
See your post #26. The tone & language of my response match yours.
FWIW, I perceive this publication as nothing more than a bunch of “blackboard theorizing” — with no experimental attempt by the authors to confirm their conjectures. IMH(engineer’s)O, that makes it only slightly more valuable than the chalk dust now on the erasers... ‘-)
***not exactly conducive to further discussion...
See your post #26. The tone & language of my response match yours.
FWIW, I perceive this publication as nothing more than a bunch of “blackboard theorizing” — with no experimental attempt by the authors to confirm their conjectures. IMH(engineer’s)O, that makes it only slightly more valuable than the chalk dust now on the erasers... ‘-)
***not exactly conducive to further discussion...