Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndyJackson

Roger that. But I notice he’s making reference to ‘zero point’ energy, amongst some pretty other bizarre assertations with repsect to quarks. It almost seems as if he’s trying to assert some sort of quantum mechanical affect.

It would also seem the article is predicated on the instances where the electron is actually on the nucleus. Something which apparently happens frequently according to the author.


125 posted on 07/04/2011 6:58:35 PM PDT by raygun (http://bastiat.org/en/the_law DOT html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: raygun
the article is predicated on the instances where the electron is actually on the nucleus. Something which apparently happens frequently according to the author.

Well yes, the l=0 n=0 bound state wavefunction of an electron has finite probability of being in the neighborhood of the nucleus, but the probability is about 1x10-15^3/.5*10-8^3 (ratioing atomic and nuclear volumes), so the probability of being "in" the nucleus is about 1*10-11. It is pretty small so any proposed close-in screening of the nuclear charge by the atomic charge is pretty negligible as a direct consequence of this weigting of charge densities.

126 posted on 07/04/2011 7:14:13 PM PDT by AndyJackson (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson