Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck

Actually what I meant was, they want public intox charges to be applied if a cabbie calls a cop on an unruly passenger. Even if a contract has been made.


36 posted on 07/01/2011 9:14:46 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: eyedigress

As it is, the cabbie has all the blackmail rights over the tipsy passenger now under this decision. If you don’t tip me real good I’ll call a cop. Why would he want it narrowed?


37 posted on 07/01/2011 9:18:13 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: eyedigress

Which would be the opposite of what I envisioned, except that a cop could swoop down on a cab with a tipsy passenger any time and take the passenger away — then the cabbie has to sue to get paid. Even in small claims court that will eat up more money in the cabbie’s time than it’s worth.


39 posted on 07/01/2011 9:20:37 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson