Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: raygun
SO why then was the XXI necessary?

I may not be following your question raygun, but the 21st amendment was necessary to repeal the 18th, thereby once again making it Constitutional nationally to hit the sauce. It went further with enforcement language supporting the right of the states to carry on with prohibition if they wanted to. What am I missing?

For crying out loud, it would seem that all that's necessary is the Preamble; Congress can do what ever it wants in that regard. The USA could have the world's shortest consitution.

I share your frustration.

44 posted on 07/02/2011 4:46:50 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have only two choices: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake
Amendemtn XXI has three sections. How many are necessary if it was putatively to repeal the XVIII Amendment?

It seems that section II of XVIII is a clue; the States are being granted authority conferred under X.

Sweet.

Its good to be the King; wait for the shake.

47 posted on 07/02/2011 5:13:41 PM PDT by raygun (http://bastiat.org/en/the_law DOT html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson