[JustaDumbBlonde]

"I’m not threatened by gays."

I don't feel personally threatened by homos, but I do feel that our entire society is threatened by the homosexual agenda. In the 70's the queers just wanted to be accepted, in the 80's they wanted to be recognized formally, in the 90's they were far enough out of the closet to start demanding special rights, and this decade they are demanding that their deviant behavior be taught to elementary students as something that is normal.

Of course, the evolution of the homo agenda is a bit more complicated than my brief run-down, but hopefully you see my point.

"Pro-equality votes are votes."

All votes are votes. All people are free to vote as they please. On one hand you may accept a vote from a homo as a citizen, it is all together something different to allow them to promote their personal and societal agenda through politics. That is where this will end up going.

"First, we have to win this next election, and then we can sort it all out."

Once things like this get in, there is no sorting it out later. That would be discrimination and run into every bugaboo in existence, both social and legal. Do you really think republicans would win the elections and then turn around and get all of the pro-deviant behavior out of the power structure?

Just my two cents and I mean you no harm by disagreeing with your comments. :)

[Nowhere Man]

I don't feel personally threatened by homos, but I do feel that our entire society is threatened by the homosexual agenda. In the 70's the queers just wanted to be accepted, in the 80's they wanted to be recognized formally, in the 90's they were far enough out of the closet to start demanding special rights, and this decade they are demanding that their deviant behavior be taught to elementary students as something that is normal.

Personally as long as they keep it private, I don't care who goes to bed with whom. As to some States allowing same sex marriage, it is part of our system to let each State decide for itself on such matters although it should come from within the people of the State, not to be forced upon by judges or legislators with an agenda. It is up to us in each State to let our legislators know where we stand and put the right ones into office.

Still, I don't believe the GOP should have a "gay rep" or any other rep, we know what values they have or should have. Also, they should be kept out of schools, sex ed, if any, should be approved by the parents and should stick to the facts.

I don't see homosexuals as monsters though, at worse, I see them as misguided individuals at worst, as long as they keep it private and so on, I'd leave them alone. If they want to vote GOP, fine, I have no problem with that, but they must understand that a party cannot be all things to all people.

If such an agenda by the radicals of the gay movement prove detrimental to our security and way of life, then yes, we must stand in their way.