Replies

everything I say is twisted around by the over-focused excitable anti gay lobby here.

Twisted?

Do you forget writing this?:

I don't care if he believes in G-d or who he has sex with.

And yes, I am fine with the atheists and the purely fiscal conservatives here on FR. These people are part of us, and they wish for Constitutional principles like we do.

Yep, these atheistic fiscal-only types are just fine with sodomite marriage and the massacre of nearly 4000 babies EVERY DAY.

I don’t want a Christian nation, I want a Free Republic.

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
-- John Adams

I said anyone who believes as we do will be helping us. Not liberals.

No, the subversives who are pushing for an end of social conservatism are a fifth column looking to destroy conservatism.

You must know that on FR, there are non-Christians, and some atheists. Since there IS a G-d, my feeling is that atheists are struggling with Him in their own way. Who knows where the struggle will end. G-d is omnipotent. So let's let Him sort that out. I welcome all FReepers who are OK with JimRob's platform. Some of the people here might do things in private that we don't like and don't even want to know about!!! There are a lot of us here. They are welcome. That is what I meant by I don't care if he believes in G-d or who he has sex with.

Always remember that if someone doesn't believe in G-d, G-d still believes in that guy. So it's OK. Give G-d a chance.

I said this, too: And yes, I am fine with the atheists and the purely fiscal conservatives here on FR. These people are part of us, and they wish for Constitutional principles like we do.

And no, someone who is a purely fiscal conservative or even a libertarian does NOT necessarily believe that gay marriage or abortion is good. Those do not go together. In fact, I have read some libertarian beliefs on abortion that wish for freedom for everyone conceived. I'm not a libertarian, but I agree with their way of thinking, that has nothing to do with our Biblical commandments. They do not see it as right to impose someone else's wish to stop life for another person.

Mine: I don’t want a Christian nation, I want a Free Republic.

Yours: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
-- John Adams

The two above statements are definitely not mutually exclusive and I agree with them both.

No, the subversives who are pushing for an end of social conservatism are a fifth column looking to destroy conservatism.

This is too complicated to really respond to. Do you mean pushing for an end to social conservatism as a platform for the GOP, when it clicks off so many independent voters? There are plenty of social conservatives who understand that some of this stuff is not decided by the president and should stay "low" on a platform. I don't think anyone could get rid of social conservatism as a philosophy because it EXISTS and always will. And a moral, religious philosophy has, throughout history, saved the rears of the more flighty, superficial, amoral populations. The grasshoppers (liberals) of the world will always need the principled, religious, moral ants to save them! So I can't really speak about that statement.