[ansel12]

If you think the law is sufficient to protect children and to properly punish and keep away predators, I truly fear for any put in your trust.

You really are clueless, you are talking to a social conservative and you want to pretend that is what I am fighting for

You are at war with our culture and morals and are strengthening the same court decisions of the last 60 years that has led to the government running every facet of all of our lives, you support the federal government against the parents and local communities, that is how you advance the homosexual agenda, you guys had to crush our communities and our self rule before you could force things like the homosexual agenda onto our communities and culture.

Only the force of law and the force of a hostile govenrment could advance your homosexual agenda on a nation of conservatives that fought it all the way.

[allmendream]

Wow was that incoherent, reactionary, and homofixated.

I do NOT support government intrusion into the minutiae of everyday life - federal, state, or local. That is the entire point of the argument that apparently you were too blind to see. I support individual responsibility not the nannyState.

You are for any law that abridges freedom so long as you can delude yourself that it will curb licentiousness.

Where morality exists a law is not necessary - where morality does not exist - the law will be insufficient.

You want laws. You think these laws will protect you. You are a fool to think so.