Conservatives have been fighting against the homosexual agenda for 45 years, not for it.
Would you support a law calling for homosexual acts to be punishable by death? Would anyone opposed to such a law be against Conservatives by your standard?
I don't care one bit for that 2% or so of the population that is gay.
I don't base my judicial philosophy on “anything that opposes homosexuality” - there are much bigger fish to fry - like the nannyState saying a business cannot offer a toy with a child's meal - or that parents cannot circumcise - or any number of other regulations and laws that do not recognize that we have a government of limited and enumerated powers and individual liberty.
But I guess that - just as the Japanese during WWII were imprisoned without trial - to you homosexuals are a target of opportunity to curtail freedom. You are driven by emotion not logic - and seek to take the “unless you support nannyState regulations you support homosexuals”.
As Lenny Bruce pointed out “Take away the right to say F*ck and you take away the right to say “F*ck the Government!”.
The nannyStaters are usually on the left - but as you amply illustrate - we have our share on the right as well. The basis is as I have said - and you have ignored .....
You support any and all nannyState legislation so long as you agree with its aim - and disagree with nannyState legislation if you oppose its aim.
This is not a Conservative, consistent, or Constitutional position. It is the position of a not very bright reactionary imbecile.