It is hardly minutia to have a consistent and logical standard by which the “nanny State” is to be judged.
You apparently don’t have one, and don’t think you need one.
You seem to support nanny State laws or not support them based upon whose “ox” is being “gored” rather than having a consistent and logical standard.
Would you characterize a Court ruling that a circumcision ban in San Francisco was Unconstitutional as “the court’s boot (on) traditional America’s neck”?
You must be a strong supporter of the gains that homosexuals have made since the 1960s.