The Warren Court became libertarians?
Come again?
The Warren Court was known as our great libertarian court, they used ‘individual rights’ to start dismantling the nation and our culture.
Earl Warren’s was a Libertarian hero with his sweeping new view of the constitution and finding individual rights all the time and eliminating 170 years of American community and culture, with libertarianism the government decides everything, the people can only await it’s rulings.
The Warren Court was the real hippie movement of the 60s.
“From 1953 to 1969, Earl Warren presided as chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Under Warren’s leadership, the Court actively used judicial review to strictly scrutinize and overturn state and federal statutes, to apply many provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states, and to provide opportunities for those groups in society that had been excluded from the political process. During Warren’s tenure, the Court became increasingly liberal and activist, drawing the fire of political and judicial conservatives who believed that the Warren Court had overstepped its constitutional role and had become a legislative body. The Warren Court itself became a catalyst for change, initiating reforms rather than responding to pressures applied by other branches of government.
The Warren Court was committed to the promotion of a libertarian and egalitarian society. The Court used the strict scrutiny test of constitutional review to strike down legislation that directly abridged the exercise of fundamental rights or narrowed the number of people who might exercise them, and to invalidate legislation that discriminated on the basis of race, religion, and other suspect classifications. Under strict scrutiny, the government has the burden of proving that a compelling state interest exists for the legislation and that the law was narrowly tailored to minimize the restriction on the fundamental right. This burden proved difficult to meet during the Warren Court years, turning the federal courts into institutions that protected the interests of politically unpopular individuals and members of relatively powerless minority groups who had been victimized by pervasive historical, political, economic, and social discrimination.”