I would call it morally lacking. Please read post #29,
Interesting but completely irrelevant. “Politics is the art of the possible.” What did ANYONE hope to gain by having Obama’s BC challenged? It was painfully obvious that all he would do is trot out some piece of paper that remotely looked like a BC and the press would close the case. While it was amusing to watch the leftists squirm for a few days, there was no way it was going to accomplish anything. Now, anything else that has to do with Obama’s past is subject to the same level of scoffing as “birthers” whether it’s warranted or not.
So, offering the “evidence” that Petraeus didn’t sink his long, distinguished career that still has places to go (i.e. CIA director, likely Cabinet appointments, maybe even VPOTUS or POTUS) over something that was very obviously going to go nowhere, that that somehow negates what he’s accomplished as a very effective, proven wartime leader? Complete nonsense. Patton could’ve done the same thing and he’d be screamed at by idiots on this site.
This is more FReeper handwringing over B.S., not facts. Too many idiots on here who want to get worked up, but no one willing to do any actual analysis. Far too typical around here these days, and it didn’t used to be like that.