Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kickass Conservative

Questionable is how all manner of studies are thrown in the hopper and a blanket conclusion drawn — rather than looking for reasons why some seemed to show good success and others had no results or negative results. It’s darn hard to control all the factors with a disease as slippery as cancer and with nursing expertise in administering a drug as intended varying widely.


49 posted on 06/29/2011 2:03:30 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
My experience has varied. When I was diagnosed and had my first Chemo Treatments, most of my numbers jumped back up to normal and I was in full Remission for about three years.

When I fell out of Remission, I went back into Chemo using the same cocktail of Drugs with a slight variation on dosage. Although my numbers improved after that second treatment, I am still not where I was and most of my numbers are below normal levels.

No matter the treatment, no matter the Miracle Drug, it may work on some but not all. Unfortunately, there will always be an attitude that if the treatment is not 100% effective in 100% of Patients, the Government shouldn’t allow its use.

Kind of reminds me of the CSI syndrome that is prevalent on today's Trial Juries. Beyond a reasonable doubt has become must be proved with 100% certainty. If it's on a TV Show, it must be true. Instead of CSI it's House the miracle worker.

51 posted on 06/29/2011 10:05:21 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (If Sarah Palin was President, you would have a job by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson