Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

It costs more to keep people alive with the proper meds than to take the mes away so they die quicker. Breast cancer treatment today, what will it be tomorrow? And we thought China was evil killing baby girls.
Welcome to the new Amerika.


3 posted on 06/28/2011 2:05:57 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bgill
Avastin was thought to be useful in breast cancer. At the same time it was not thought to be useful in uterine cancer.

Even with studies in hand showing it's utility you couldn't get access to it for uterine cancer.

Then one day "they" decided it was OK for that kind of cancer, but shortly thereafter began withdrawing their approval of it for breast cancer.

People close to us were part of that story ~ but in the end Avastin is NOT and cannot be a cure. Patients' cancer cells develop a sort of resistance to it.

At best these drugs just stave off the end.

I'd like to note for you these are not casual drugs to just pop in your mouth and wash down with water.

8 posted on 06/28/2011 2:13:22 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson