Rigged! Feds find fix was in on 'study' of homosexuality in ranks.

wnd ^ | June 27, 2011 | Bob Unruh

[ImNotLying]

A previously undisclosed report by the inspector general of the Department of Defense concludes that the fix – maybe even handed down by the White House – was in before the military ever started asking soldiers and sailors about how opening the ranks to homosexuals would affect the nation's defense.

[little jeremiah]

Here’s the truth about homosexuals in the military, and some of these are about testimony to Congress. Where are the R’s? Why are they silent? Why are they not supporting the military, the vast majority of whom do NOT want to associate with sex perverts?

Senate Testimony: European Militaries Are Not Role Models for U.S.
The Center for Military Readiness ^ | 3/22/2010

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608228/posts

Rates of Homosexual Assault in the Military Are Disproportionately High
FRC ^

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608306/posts

In Support the 1993 Law Stating that Homosexuals are not Eligible to Serve in the Military
CMR ^ | July 23, 2008 | Elaine Donnelly

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608370/posts

Has Homosexuality Always Been Incompatible With Military Service?
WallBuilders ^ | David Barton

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1613341/posts

Homosexual Assault in the Military
Family Reserch Council ^ | Peter Sprigg

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608193/posts

[fwdude]

I was told by one troll that the fact that so few didn't answer the survey didn't matter, that it was still a valid sample (actually, only 29% of service members answered, per the "comprehensive" report.) But if you think about the organization involved, the military, where prompt, accurate attention and compliance to orders is the rule of existence, the fact that so few answered, and sluggishly so, and so many refused to answer in violation of orders is absolutely astounding.

I always say that the number of people who didn't answer the survey spoke much louder than the ones who did.

[panthermom]

It was bogus from the beginning and the facts were right there for all to see, however nobody bothered to read it!!! But we should not expect any different.

Right from the get go, when they summarized the sampling, it stated that most of the respondents, lived off base in private housing, I believe of those 25% something like 10% were spouses. The majority were here stateside. The sampling was garbage to begin with.