Possibly, but the only way one could know for certain was if she had kept her distance and kept her mouth shut. If she had done that, but quietly filmed and was still arrested, than one could say that it was because the cop was anti-camera she was arrested.
However, because she chose to insert herself into the arrest by filming too close and being a distraction, she could have been arrested, even if she had no camera.
>>filming too close and being a distraction, she could have been arrested, even if she had no camera.
<<
That is complete bullcrap. By that definition, every cop in NYC could clear any city block because “I don’t feel safe”
That is absolute bullcrap.
This is police harassment, pure and simple.
Jonty, please explain the retaliation the cops did afterward. I want your rationalization. Please.
And one other tidbit, at the time of the arrest, the cop KNEW the woman was not a danger. He just wanted to play Johnny Badass, and he couldn’t have a woman not “obeying” his “orders” in front of his buddies and the crowd.
This ***** was on a power trip.
Are you not allowing even for that possibility? Be fair.
Emily Good would have probably scared you too.
If you are so passionate about this maybe you can enjoin yourself with her civil case and get sued like your hero.