To: SoldierDad; Jonty30
Are you defending the cop’s actions? On what basis? The reason the case was not prosecuted is simple, and the DA explained it: THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF ANY CRIME. WHATSOEVER.
Why are you having so much trouble with that?
196 posted on
06/28/2011 10:39:54 AM PDT by
Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
(Dear Lord, Please judge Barack Hussein Obama for betraying Israel, and not the whole nation. Amen.)
To: Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
I'm defending this officer's (and any officer's) right to secure the scene where they are engaged in a police action. This woman was too close to where the police action was taking place, and the officer was right to request she remove herself from where she was. Demanding she go into her home may, and I emphasize "MAY" have been over the top, but his initial reaction was appropriate.
By the way, people can, and are, arrested for situations where after the fact charges are dismissed, and the officer not held to account for the arrest (in other words, the arrest was appropriate, but the DA decided not to pursue charges). Simply because THIS DA didn't have any balls to stand behind this officer's arrest of this woman doesn't mean that the arrest was invalid or inappropriate.
199 posted on
06/28/2011 11:17:25 AM PDT by
SoldierDad
(Proud dad of an Army Soldier currently deployed in the Valley of Death, Afghanistan)
To: Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
This is just too funny...
200 posted on
06/28/2011 11:25:20 AM PDT by
Chunga85
("Foreclosure Fraud", TARP, "Fight Club Lawyer", Bailout)
To: Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
The cops actions are defendable. He has his safety to be concerned about, even if you cannot appreciate it.
203 posted on
06/28/2011 11:44:20 AM PDT by
Jonty30
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson