Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: laotzu
Government wasn't "in the marriage business" until it started to re-define what marriage was. Before that, it was acknowledging an existing social custom and the benefits derived from it.

What NY and other states have done is change the meaning of the words, and insists that everyone accept it. I used this analogy with my wife: You can throw right-handed or left-handed, but you cannot say that you are throwing right-handed when you use your left hand. But now, NY says that everyone throws right-handed even when they use their left hand.

6 posted on 06/27/2011 9:10:49 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: kosciusko51
Government wasn't "in the marriage business" until it started to re-define what marriage was. Before that, it was acknowledging an existing social custom and the benefits derived from it.

For as long as the United States has been independent, the states have defined who can get married; there are different age and consaguinity rules in different states, and many states had restrictions on interracial marriage until the 1960s.

19 posted on 06/29/2011 12:07:39 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson