Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz

I also was not talking about a bar of government interference as you claim. I may not even support this specific law. My problem has to do with the Court acting as if they can deny the People the right to have representation on how their state is governed. There is nothing un-Constitutional about this law at all. You seem to think that the People have no right to representation on public decency and child safety.


139 posted on 06/27/2011 1:03:42 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: TheBigIf
I also was not talking about a bar of government interference as you claim. I may not even support this specific law. My problem has to do with the Court acting as if they can deny the People the right to have representation on how their state is governed. There is nothing un-Constitutional about this law at all. You seem to think that the People have no right to representation on public decency and child safety.

Hey. Improvement. Not once did you call me a LIBERTARIAN, ANARCHIST, DICTATOR, HIPPY, OR NAZI. Good job!

Well, here: Ths SCOTUS has for a long time decided the Constitutionality of all manners of populace-popular legislation. Otherwise, states might still have slaves; voting poll taxes might still be in place; firearms might still be banned in DC and Chicago; and so on.

144 posted on 06/27/2011 1:11:10 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Until Obama, has there ever been, in history, a Traitorous Ruler?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson