Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Manufacturers have already moved down the road"

They'll move back.

1 posted on 06/27/2011 7:24:55 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Libloather; proud_yank; Bockscar; grey_whiskers; WL-law; IrishCatholic; Whenifhow; SolitaryMan; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

2 posted on 06/27/2011 7:26:29 AM PDT by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
"a patchwork of inconsistent standards across the nation that would mean increased manufacturing and distribution costs, higher prices for consumers and lost sales for retailers."

On the street we call it a "cluster f***".

3 posted on 06/27/2011 7:27:26 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

And God said, “Let there be light.”

And Texas said, “Amen!”


4 posted on 06/27/2011 7:28:20 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

You can buy 100 watt bulbs cheap by the case on the internet (ebay, amazon, etc).


7 posted on 06/27/2011 7:38:45 AM PDT by Voltage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“Governor Jan Brewer, who said it could not be implemented because within the state there are no mining or processing plants for tungsten, which is needed for incandescent bulbs.”

Nice BS excuse. Federal hack.


10 posted on 06/27/2011 7:41:41 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Any manufacturer who has “moved down the road” is an idiot. In a capitalistic society the consumer is the driver.

Research into new technology is what a manufacturer does on the side and he tests the consumer’s responses on a small scale. If the consumer response is good, he ramps up production. If the old product falls out of favor and the manufacture can no longer make money, he drops it.

Buggy whip production didn’t stop with the invention of the automobile, it effectively stopped when there was no longer enough demand to make it profitable. (Buggy whips are still made but they’re a specialty item)


12 posted on 06/27/2011 7:48:59 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
"The government has no business telling an individual what kind of light bulb to buy," said Representative Michele Bachmann, who is running for president, in introducing her "Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act" earlier this year. And she told a party gathering in June: "President Bachmann will allow you to buy any light bulb you want in the United States of America."

Bravely speaking truth to popular fiction, Bachmann has more courage (and common sense) than the rest of the current field of announced GOPer candidates, combined.

In fact, she can be referred to as the ONE BRIGHT LIGHT among the Republicans.

.

13 posted on 06/27/2011 7:49:43 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Here in Maine, where it’s dark at 4 PM in winter, I’ve already stockpiled enough 100 watt light bulbs to last me until the end of World War 7.

Still, I intend to buy more, and also more 75 and 60 watt bulbs.

The “old fashioned” light bulbs also help to heat up a small room, an added benefit in a cold climate.


15 posted on 06/27/2011 7:58:45 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Palin / West in 2012 or West / Palin. Either combination will serve America well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz; AT7Saluki; writer33
...so that the bulbs with a lighting equivalent of 100 watts consume just 72 watts.

They'll be labeled '72 watt bulbs' - no?

16 posted on 06/27/2011 8:01:49 AM PDT by Libloather (The epitome of civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Oh yes they will. They will move where the money is. I hope and pray this law is repealed. I’ve already had enough with low flow toilets. Thanks to government taking away our rights to own a toilet that actually works.


18 posted on 06/27/2011 8:04:01 AM PDT by MsLady (Be the kind of woman that when you get up in the morning, the devil says, "Oh crap, she's UP !!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
I don't even *use* 100W bulbs, and I bought an 8-pack of them to put aside.

Why? I might need to have one, someday.

Tell the nanny state to get the $^##$% out of my life!

19 posted on 06/27/2011 8:04:46 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“The law does not ban incandescent bulbs.”

Yeah right. Try finding one to buy once the law goes into effect.


22 posted on 06/27/2011 8:11:18 AM PDT by cydcharisse (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Throw out the law mandating low-flush toilets as well.


27 posted on 06/27/2011 8:31:12 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Just show that the energy ‘consumed’ is not only 100% from when you turn the bulb on and off

The manufacturing costs for these things must be 10 times the cost of an incandescent, and what about the disposal and environmental ‘costs’ of MERCURY in each and every one?

The toxic cleanup from one broken ‘new’ bulbs is 1000 times the energy of a regular bulb.

29 posted on 06/27/2011 8:51:33 AM PDT by Mr. K (CAPSLOCK! -Unleash the fury! [Palin/Bachman 2012- unbeatable ticket])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

All the libs need to do is get a rider attached that bans corn subsidies. Then she’ll change her tune.


30 posted on 06/27/2011 8:52:46 AM PDT by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Some consumers have also begun hoarding the old incandescent bulbs based on an erroneous fear that these will be banned starting January 1 and consumers will be forced to buy compact fluorescent or other new types of bulbs. The law does not ban incandescent bulbs, but creates new standards for them, basically requiring increased efficiency...

That's odd - the 100-watt incandescent outdoor floodlight bulbs have already been phased-out. I don't see any "100-watt equivalent" incandescents of that bulb type on the shelves.

31 posted on 06/27/2011 8:58:05 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“However, new legislation may not change what manufacturers are doing in creating more efficient bulbs that use halogen, LED or other new technology.”

So what? LEDs are better but the market should decide that, not the government.


32 posted on 06/27/2011 9:00:44 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

they’ll still be making old-school lightbulbs for years to come for the 90% of countries that either can’t afford “green” lighting or were not stupid enough to pass this mandate.


38 posted on 06/27/2011 9:43:52 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“Manufacturers have already moved down the road”

“They’ll move back. “

Maybe, maybe not. CFls and LEDs have advantages, but the old fashioned light is cheap and effective for many uses.

What is certain is that Government dictation of this is destructive and dumb.


40 posted on 06/27/2011 10:50:48 AM PDT by WOSG (Herman Cain for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
critics of the law claim CFLs contain toxic mercury

Following the logic presented here, supporters of the law deny CFLs contain toxic mercury. Right?

46 posted on 06/27/2011 1:41:58 PM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative (Two blogs for the price of none!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson