To: sickoflibs
Then please explain all the air time Fox gives to speculation about Rick Perry. He is not announced either but receives considerable attention on Fox. With Palin, it's ‘move on, not worth our time, next question’.
106 posted on
06/27/2011 6:46:18 AM PDT by
JPG
(Hey, LSM, how are those emails workin' out for ya?)
To: JPG; andy58-in-nh; stephenjohnbanker; indylindy
RE :”
Then please explain all the air time Fox gives to speculation about Rick Perry. He is not announced either but receives considerable attention on Fox. With Palin, it's move on, not worth our time, next question. “
Perry doesnt work for FNC. Talk of Perry is ‘news’ meaning it's new. There has not been 2 years straight of Perry 2012 stories. You know 'news' ='new's?? $$$$ ??? Did you know that FNC main function is to make $$$$ as a business??? And they do a great job at it too.
Palin decided she wanted to continue on at FNC and also make $$$ there. Palin decides not to be a candidate today. Not FNC and not PDSers.
I hope this is not leading to silly narrative where Palin announces she decides not to run (at all in 2012) and the blame is put on those that thought she would not run. That would be clearly idiotic logic.
127 posted on
06/27/2011 7:09:04 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
To: JPG
The people in the know at fox know the contract commitments of Palin, so no need to ask the other questions. Simple!!!!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson