Replies

I take the woman's legislative history, resume, public statements and see if the narrative makes sense. See if her rhetoric matches her reality. Then I look for the parts I think are missing, both experience wise as well as the personal story.

I have already seen obfuscation regarding the foster children. When asked how long the children stayed with her she said "It varied". Then said they haven't discussed it so the children can maintain their privacy. I call BS. There is nothing that keeps Mrs. Bachmann from saying child A spent x to xx, etc, etc. If her supporters on this thread believe the MSM is going to settle for this as an answer, they are crazy.

I ask the questions we should all be asking of all our candidates. We better vet them, because we know damned sure the MSM/Dems will. This election is too important to just select a candidate, then have "Surprise".

I make no apologies for asking the hard questions the Bachmann/Palin sycophants/haters refuse to ask. Believe me, they will be asked at some point.

Wonderful post. I’m glad to see people checking things out, and asking the hard questions.

I despise sycophancy. All too often, I read posts with blind alleigiance to A, B, C, etc. As you said, the last thing needed is a “SURPRISE !” with two weeks left until election day. I doubt anyone here want to see this headline; “President Obama re-elected in stunning landslide - mandate for four more years of hope and change.

Also, I agree that the MSM won’t vet the GOP candidate. But if they come up with something damaging, or otherwise salacious or negative....can you say October Surprise?

Aren’t the foster children adults now?

Isn’t it a bit suspicious that of 23 not a single one comes forward on their own to endorse her?