Wrong.
Nothing about my comment touches on whether or not the info Bachmann gave was false or incorrect.
My simple point was about the size and reach of the federal government. It was about how stupid this entire flap is in the context of the larger catastrophe facing our nation that we are headed to a place where the vast majority of Americans "benefit from" (are dependent upon) the government.
IOW, the LSM is sitting around worried about whether Michele Bachmann's father-in-law's farm's federal tax credits (or whatever) flowed a financial benefit to Mrs. Bachmann while we have a President who is doing everything within his power, with the full support of that same LSM, to flow federal financial "benefits" to as many government slaves as possible.
I tried to make that point in a more pithy way. Obviously, didn't work for some.
How you see in that an "excuse" for whatever Mrs. Bachmann said seems like an emotional overreaction to me.
That is all.
(P.S. Just a suggestion: lose the added-on personal insults ("do I need to explain it to you?") and just make your points.
LOL, what? I used the word "fine" in my post to you. How is that an emotional overreaction.
Anyway, along with your objection to my use of the word "fine" I will add that I thought your following statements were emotional overations.
fightinJAG:what in Hell’s Bells is so upsetting and disqualifying about that?
(P.S. Just a suggestion: Don't put false words in people's mouths...e.g. "upset", "disqualifying", "deliberate false information")