Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GreenLanternCorps

Contempt for Custer?

One of the greatest heroes of the Civil War?

Savior of Gettysburg in his first action as General?

A man who always led from the front?

The man who forced Lee’s surrender at appomatax on April 9th with his bold moves?

How on earth could you have contempt for such a man!


69 posted on 06/25/2011 9:32:59 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Pikachu_Dad
"How on earth could you have contempt for such a man!"

"Contempt" isn't a word I would use to describe Custer either; but would you agree that Custer seemed to have changed dramatically after the Civil War?

It just seems like a different man is using the same name. Men who served under him - and admired him - during the War ended up hating his guts out West. He got Court Martialed because he basically abandoned his command to get home to Libby, he apparently abandoned Major Elliot to his fate at the Washita, he ordered summary executions of deserters... He exhibited traits out west that no soldier would admire or respect - traits that were not mentioned during the Civil War.

He baffles me.

87 posted on 06/25/2011 10:06:09 PM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

did I miss the sarcasm tag?


92 posted on 06/25/2011 10:18:06 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Did you forget the sarcasm tag? Custer may have had some modest success on occasion during the late unpleasantries between the states but he often displayed qualities of rebellious misbehavior, recklessness and rank idiocy out West.


95 posted on 06/25/2011 10:24:16 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Burn 'em Bright!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

He got his whole command wiped out by seriously underestimating his enemy. It’s the most one sided loss in US history. I think that’s worthy of contempt.


119 posted on 06/26/2011 5:44:30 AM PDT by GreenLanternCorps ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Jimmy Carter".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

He fought for the wrong side? heh


129 posted on 06/26/2011 7:28:25 AM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

The man who forced Lee’s surrender at appomatax on April 9th with his bold moves?

***How on earth could you have contempt for such a man!****

Because he fought those sweet little darlins the Indians! That makes him bad!

Look at Chivington. His command saved the Union from defeat at Glorietta Pass in New Mexico, but he is only remembered for his “massacre” of “peaceful” Indians (who had admitted they were still hostile) at Sand Creek in which he found fresh white scalps and a robe fringed with white women’s scalps.

Custer did the Washita battle in Oklahoma. He followed the raiders back to the camp in fresh snow, attacked the camp and found white captives there. Same a Indians who were at Sand Creek.


142 posted on 06/26/2011 8:37:59 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name. See my home page, if you dare! NEW PHOTOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson