Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael.SF.

Custer ignored the opinions of his scouts as they were approaching the area. The scouts looked at the tracks and sign on the ground, and told Custer that columns of Indians and horses were converging. Custer disagreed, and asserted the trails were diverging.

His scouts consistently put the numbers of Indians ahead of them at “at least 2500,” and Custer kept downplaying this number to less than 2000. The eventual truth came in at far more than 2500.

From all the accounts I can find to read, Indian and white/USA, Custer simply comes off as a cocksure, brash commander who could not respect the opinions of subordinates. His early success as a battlefield commander, in retrospect, had a large element of luck.

Luck eventually runs out, and when there isn’t cool competence to back it up, the truth comes to the fore.


58 posted on 06/25/2011 9:18:31 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: NVDave
I would agree with all of what you have said.

Custer and Obama have/had the commonality of self confidence in themselves.

91 posted on 06/25/2011 10:15:48 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson