Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: odds

Islam under the monarchy was what we now call “Eslaameh Shahanshahi” which basically was “Islam very-light” with nobody forced to obey any of the sharia laws nor tenets.

That wold be accetable anywhere but not by the Jihadi Islam of Obama and his supporters.


25 posted on 06/26/2011 7:24:06 PM PDT by FARS (Be healthy, happy and thrive,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: FARS
“Eslaameh Shahanshahi” roughly translates as "monarchic or monarchical Islam" - can't think of a more appropriate translation at the moment. I appreciate it was "Islam lite". Though, point remains that there is no such Islam even if accepted by the average Ali, Hossein, Reza, Zahra & Dariush in Iran because they liked their social freedoms under the Shah. Hence, leading the ordinary Iranian to think that “Eslaameh Shahanshahi” is the norm. It isn't/wasn't. Obviously many others (not just Jihadis, but religious moslem Iranian families didn't accept that newly invented Islam. It was untenable & a misrepresentation of Islam, itself.
26 posted on 06/26/2011 7:48:58 PM PDT by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson