Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Bill Attacks Federal Marijuana War
The New American ^ | June 24, 2011 | Alex Newman

Posted on 06/25/2011 1:50:46 AM PDT by danielmryan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: danielmryan

Liberal Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts, who introduced the bill with Paul, also blasted federal policies on the substance. “Criminally prosecuting adults for making the choice to smoke marijuana is a waste of law enforcement resources and an intrusion on personal freedom,” he told reporters.

“I do not advocate urging people to smoke marijuana. Neither do I urge them to drink alcoholic beverages or smoke tobacco,” Frank added. “But in none of these cases do I think prohibition enforced by criminal sanctions is good public policy.”


I did not believe that i could agree with that guy about anything, but there you are.


21 posted on 06/25/2011 4:53:50 AM PDT by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father
A conservative does not support federal drug laws. A conservative understands the feds are granted no authority by the constitution to so legislate. This is a matter for each state to handle as it deems fit.

Exactly right.

22 posted on 06/25/2011 5:01:27 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007
This "law" would prove destructive to the very moral fabric of the nation and would result in the destruction of multitudes of lives and untold misery resulting in further lawlessness, wickedness and ungodliness.

Translation: "If they ever legalize pot, I'm out of a job!"

23 posted on 06/25/2011 5:05:03 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan
Agreed infinity percent. I personally believe that the War on Drugs was the government's way to get a blank check to engage in all manner of unconstitutional abuses of power against the people. It is a direct assault against our liberties, and has very little to do with drugs at all... especially when one considers that the drug problem in the USA gets worse and worse and worse.

Legalize ALL drugs.

24 posted on 06/25/2011 5:13:08 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan

Canadian law illegalizes the same substances that U.S. law does, but there’s little to no overkill in Canada. That’s because there’s been no erosion of civil liberties in Canada.


I have,nt been to Canada very many times but what i saw made me wonder if they even have any civil liberties, i was instructed to stop at the weigh station and buy a permit for running in Canada with my truck which i did.

The cops searched my truck, searched my wifes purse, kept me there two hours trying to find something in my drivers log to ticket me for and could find nothing.

The Canadian drivers would come in and all kinds of things were found wrong in their drivers logs but all they did was to lick the boots of the cops and then be on their way with a little scolding like they were little kids.

My last time in Canada.


25 posted on 06/25/2011 5:24:15 AM PDT by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

“With the growth of Federal laws and regulations, we will simply have more criminals.”

As intended.


That is right, more government job insurance, more free loaders in government living off of the rest of us.


26 posted on 06/25/2011 5:35:35 AM PDT by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007

“Ron Paul is a NUT! This “law” would prove destructive to the very moral fabric of the nation and would result in the destruction of multitudes of lives and untold misery resulting in further lawlessness, wickedness and ungodliness”

Civilization is under threat not from pot smoking, but from a proliferating police state.


27 posted on 06/25/2011 5:42:59 AM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

The vast majority of libertarians do NOT want marijuana available to children or child rape. They want the Government out of *adult’s* business.

I have no idea what the average libertarians want with the borders, but I do know that abolishing welfare, ending the practice of ‘anchor babies’, and stopping the war on drugs will go a long way to stop illegals from coming here.


28 posted on 06/25/2011 5:44:41 AM PDT by Marie (I agree with everything that Rick Perry is saying. I just wish that *he* did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Palter

Don’t forget that the War on Drugs has become a War on Chronic Pain sufferers.

You cannot allow pain sufferers access to pain medications without some of it falling into the hands of addicts. So what happens is that nobody gets relief.


29 posted on 06/25/2011 5:47:15 AM PDT by Marie (I agree with everything that Rick Perry is saying. I just wish that *he* did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007

Is Sarah Palin a ‘nut’, too?

***************

“If somebody’s gonna smoke a joint in their house and not do anybody any harm, then perhaps there are other things our cops should be looking at to engage in and try to clean up some of the other problems we have in society.”
Sarah Palin

Sarah Palin: Smoking Pot Is No Big Deal
Sarah Palin says recreational pot smoking is “relatively speaking a minimal problem” in America.
In an otherwise uneventful appearance on the Fox Business Network with Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, Palin said that while she doesn’t believe marijuana should be legalized, the country has bigger fish to fry.
“I think we need to prioritize our law enforcement efforts,” she said. “If somebody’s gonna smoke a joint in their house and not do anybody any harm, then perhaps there are other things our cops should be looking at to engage in and try to clean up some of the other problems we have in society.”
Allen St. Pierre, the director of NORML, which supports liberalizing drug laws, said Palin’s position on pot is perfectly in line with her identity as a politician.
“If you’re a populist as she appears to be, it’s maybe not that surprising,” he told AOL News in a phone interview today.
But has the former Republican vice presidential candidate ever lit up a joint?
You betcha. In Alaska, it was legal to smoke small amounts of marijuana until four years ago, and Palin has said that she’s tried it but didn’t like it.
“I can’t claim a Bill Clinton and say that I never inhaled,” she told the Anchorage Daily News in 2006.


30 posted on 06/25/2011 5:49:21 AM PDT by Marie (I agree with everything that Rick Perry is saying. I just wish that *he* did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan

Will be hard to legalize any kind of dope. It would put all the drug dealers and three fourths of the cops out of jobs. Big crimp in the prison industry, rehabilitation clinics, local government budgets, etc.

Have a little mercy, jackbooted thugs got to live too.


31 posted on 06/25/2011 5:51:37 AM PDT by tickmeister (tickmeister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan

I think legalizing this particular drug would benefit the country in many ways. Taxation, freeing up courts, etc

It has little more effect on someone than alcohol.

I am not in favor of harder drugs, but this one can be regulated like cigarettes with sales to minors with safety.

It will also take away billions of dollars in drug cartel activities. Stemming the flow of violence all along the boarder.


32 posted on 06/25/2011 5:51:58 AM PDT by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan
SMOKE DOPE - GOOD

SMOKE TOBACCO - BAD


33 posted on 06/25/2011 5:54:47 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The more effeminate & debauched the people, the more they are fitted for a tyrannical government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tickmeister

what a ridiculous statement


34 posted on 06/25/2011 5:56:21 AM PDT by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tickmeister
Will be hard to legalize any kind of dope. It would put all the drug dealers and three fourths of the cops out of jobs. Big crimp in the prison industry, rehabilitation clinics, local government budgets, etc.

Have a little mercy, jackbooted thugs got to live too.

I think you hit the nail on the head. Can you even begin to imagine how many people would be out of prison if marijuana were legal? Heck, if the WoD were ended half of our crime would disappear.

Then, maybe, cops could focus their energy on actual crimes like rape and burglary. I wish that there was as much energy focused on internet child predators as there is on the WoD.

35 posted on 06/25/2011 6:06:33 AM PDT by Marie (I agree with everything that Rick Perry is saying. I just wish that *he* did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan

Any poster decrying the effect of pot on the “moral fabric” of our nation must first consider the effect on the moral fabric when government proceeds to clearly exceed its enumerated powers.

The “moral fabric” is degraded every single time government tramples on the Ninth and Tenth Amendments. What signal do we send to young people when we teach them the Constitution but they are increasingly unable to reconcile what government allows itself to do with the plain words of the text.

It says that government is corrupt and what it says has nothing to do with morality. In may cases, such as federal drug laws, those laws themselves have no basis in the enumerated powers.

The various States do have police powers according to their own Constitutions. However, when some of them legalize pot and the federal government then almost gives them a pass, what message is sent? That the law is pliable and subjective.

Corrupting the rule of law is a far greater sin because it affects everyone, including Turbo-Tax Timmy. Pot only affects those who want to get stoned to such an extent that they ruin their lives.


36 posted on 06/25/2011 6:18:57 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie; Jmouse007

It’s possible Jmouse007 forgot the /s tag.

As a former user, would like to see the day when we might partake of this substance in small quantity in our own homes without breaking the law. They talk about how the substance causes paranoia. Maybe the prospect of prosecution has something to do with that. There is much political common ground to be gained if the drug war types would give up their penchant for control over other people’s lives. Isn’t it a bit hypocritical to hanker for smaller government and a war on drugs at the same time?


37 posted on 06/25/2011 7:30:33 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (minds change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I think a lot of people mischaracterize libertarians with libertines or anarchists. Most libertarians I know believe there is a role for the government to protect our civil liberties and defend the nation against military attacks.

For me, I think that if a law lacks is so cavalierly broken and commands as little respect as it does, we should evaluate whether the law is proper. The amount of people I know who smoke shows to me that even though it is against the law, no one really respects the law.

In my case, I am against Interstates having a speed limit. If the thought is “as long as Im only 5 or 10 over the limit, the cop wont stop me” then what is the effect of having the limit?

I dont think opening the border or abolishing citizenship is in keeping with the role of government protecting the rights of the citizens, so I dont fall into that camp.

And we dont have a national age of consent law. Each state has its own laws, and some of the more conservative states like Alabama, Georgia, Kansas, and South Carolina have the lowest age, of 16. I wouldnt call those states “libertarian.”


38 posted on 06/25/2011 7:42:15 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
Isn’t it a bit hypocritical to hanker for smaller government and a war on drugs at the same time?

YES. Social conservatives are all about personal responsibility and liberty until it comes to behavior that *they* don't approve of. They don't understand that liberals do the exact same thing. (gun control laws, spanking, how much water is in your toilet, what kind of light bulbs you can use)

If we're going to have true liberty, we need to have liberty for all.

WITH THAT SAID, we also have to take away the social 'safety net' that encourages self-destructive behavior. As long as we have *that*, people will continue to fail in large numbers.

39 posted on 06/25/2011 7:43:59 AM PDT by Marie (I agree with everything that Rick Perry is saying. I just wish that *he* did. (NO to Bush II))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

And one more thing: I am not and never have been a user of marijuana.

I hate the WoD because it’s expensive and it kills our civil liberties.

I hate the WoD because it reaches into doctor’s offices and causes people with severe, chronic pain to suffer. (me!)


40 posted on 06/25/2011 7:56:45 AM PDT by Marie (I agree with everything that Rick Perry is saying. I just wish that *he* did. (NO to Bush II))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson